

Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort. B., Bullmore, E., Dolan, R., Fonagy, P., Goodyer, I., NSPN Consortium. A., Ioannidis, K., Neufeld, S., Jones, P. Designing resilience research: Using multiple methods to investigate risk exposure, promotive and protective processes, and contextually relevant outcomes for children and youth. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(1), 19–31. Varied patterns of family resilience in challenging contexts. Resilience to bullying victimization: The role of individual, family and peer characteristics. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology (pp. Dialectical processes in developmental psychopathology. Surveying Human Vulnerabilities across the Life Course (pp. Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel: Are vulnerable groups more affected than others?. Who Is and Is Not “Average”? Random Effects Selection with Spike-and-Slab Priors. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(1), 6. The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 7(1), 1–23. Resource factors for mental health resilience in early childhood: An analysis with multiple methodologies. Childhood adversity, adult stressful life events, and risk of past-year psychiatric disorder: A test of the stress sensitization hypothesis in a population-based sample of adults. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 857–885. The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Genetic and environmental processes in young children’s resilience and vulnerability to socioeconomic deprivation. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(4), 268–274. Maximizing retention with high risk participants in a clinical trial. Kim, R., Hickman, N., Gali, K., Orozco, N., & Prochaska, J. The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. J., Jovanovic, T., Kubiak, T., Lieb, K., Lutz, B., & Kleim, B. J., Galatzer-Levy, I., Geuze, E., GroppaHelmreich, S. A., Brummelman, E., Chmitorz, A., Fernàndez, G., Fiebach, C. olsrr: Tools for Building OLS Regression Models. An R Companion to Applied Regression (3rd ed.). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Mental health resilience in the adolescent offspring of parents with depression: A prospective longitudinal study. Ĭollishaw, S., Hammerton, G., Mahedy, L., Sellers, R., Owen, M. Development and Psychopathology, 8(4), 597–600. Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(7), 809–817. Families promote emotional and behavioural resilience to bullying: Evidence of an environmental effect. īowes, L., Maughan, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. Loss, Trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 205(4), 275–280. Psychiatric resilience: Longitudinal twin study. Conceptionally, however, this approach to data analysis cannot resolve the debate over whether the threshold for being characterized as resilient should be based on an entire study sample or on a subsample with influencers extracted.Īmstadter, A. The proposed influencer-adjusted residual approach to modeling resilience results in more adequate predicted outcome values and residuals than other statistical approaches. This technique decreases the likelihood to characterize a population as resilient when there is little evidence of exceptional performance by most individuals within the sample. Our goal in this paper is to present methods to identify these “influencers” and to control for their impact during model estimation. This approach can be biased by the presence of individuals that disproportionately influence the thresholds for sample characterization as resilient even when the majority of the sample population shows only normative patterns of coping under stress. This definition has been quantified through a process of residualization, the difference between an individual’s observed outcome score and its expected (predicted) outcome score using statistical modeling. Resilience as an outcome is defined as better-than-expected wellbeing and developmental progress in the context of exposure to significant adversity.
